Primus FireHole 100 Review
Our Verdict
Our Analysis and Test Results
We can confidently say that the Primus FireHole 100 is the sleekest and sexiest looking camping stove we tested. Unfortunately, that's just about the only really positive thing we have to say about it.
Performance Comparison
Group Cooking
We cannot recommend this stove for group cooking. It was one of our slowest stoves in the boil test, only surpassing the Coleman PowerPack in this test. Unless you're trying to make your dinner celebrations last all night, you're better of picking another stove.
Time to Boil
This stove took 7 minutes and 22 seconds to boil a liter of water for our coffee. Hope there aren't any serious coffee drinkers in the house! That said, remember that we performed our boil test at over 8,000 feet above sea level, so it's possible that it may not take quite this long at lower elevations.
Cooking Simmer
The Primus FireHole 100 is very good at simmering. It easily maintains a low flame without blowing out. It also cooks evenly.
Ease of Set Up
Doesn't get much simpler than this! Undo the latch closure of the stove and attach it to your propane source. Remember, this is the only stove with the propane adapter already attached to the stove body, so that's one less thing to worry about.
Ease of Care
This model's drip tray is very easy to wipe down and its cooking grate can be removed by lifting it out.
Wind Resistance
We found the flame to be very sensitive to wind. This could be due to the construction of the stove, but seems more likely to be attributed to its low flame power to begin with. Regardless, choose your cooking location wisely.
Packed Size
This camping stove packs down to 22.5 x 11.5 x 4.5." Its dimensions are comparable to other portable two-burners.
Best Application
This stove is best for car camping with small groups as it doesn't offer enough heat to cook large quantities of food/water with efficiency.
Value
We thought this stove was extremely overpriced. At $169.95, it was nearly our most expensive two-burner stove. Only the Camp Chef Explorer costs more (…just $1 more…) and it is free-standing with 30,000 BTU burners, as opposed to the 12,000 BTU burners of the Primus FireHole 100.
Conclusion
Due to the exceptional price tag of this stove and its subpar cooking performance, we don't recommend purchasing it. Our Editors' Choice, the Camp Chef Everest, costs $50 less and earned superior scores on all criteria. Even the Camp Chef Explorer 2-Burner could be an alternate option for those who don't mind spending money on a two-burner stove, since it costs nearly the same price, but has much more powerful burners and is free-standing. Most of our testers had used Primus products before with great feedback and found the Primus FireHole 100 to be a disappointment. We can only hope to see improvements in their stoves in the future. For the time being, we would rather put our money elsewhere.