We buy all the products we test — no freebies from companies. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission, which helps support our testing.
We've logged thousands of miles in running shoes from Brooks, Nike, Saucony, Hoka, Asics, and so many more to help you find the perfect pair to meet your running goals
We've been testing running shoes since 2014, having pitted more than 120 different models head-to-head on the road and sided-by-side in the lab to bring you this lineup of 29 top contenders on the market today. Our lead tester is a professional exercise specialist who's no stranger to the race podium. We pull together the full range of road running shoes, including the latest in high-tech racing shoes, the cushiest stacks, and long-time fan favorites. Every pair of shoes is tested over dozens of miles along roads and around tracks, while a second pair is sent to our lab to be cut open and measured to World Athletics standards. There is no detail we don't consider, measure, or test about these shoes.
The shoe that we love most is the Asics Novablast 4. This shoe remains our overall favorite and the one we recommend to most road runners, whether they're lifelong PR chasers or brand new to running biomechanics. The Novablast has it all — maximum cushioning without sacrificing that trampoline-like propulsion, a comfortable fit, an almost unbelievably low weight, and all for a price that belies its impressive performance.
The Saucony Kinvara 15 is our top choice for a great running shoe that still fits a more modest budget. Though its price is lower than most, this versatile trainer has an ultralight, minimalist build that doesn't leave you hanging when it comes to comfort or speed. If you're here for your next racing shoe, there's no model we recommend more than the Asics Metaspeed Sky Paris. It's approachable to run in, yet explosively propulsive and absurdly lightweight.
Not all running gear is as necessary as its makers might lead you to believe — we've put it to the test. Our exercise enthusiasts can help you find the perfect sports bra to keep you secure and comfortable. For longer distances, our testing can help you find a great hydration pack. We've pitted the top treadmills out there against each other, or if you're looking to hit the dirt, we've also tested the best trail running shoes.
Editor's Note: We updated this article on November 3, 2024, to include numerous new contenders from Asics, New Balance, Hoka, Altra, Brooks, and more.
Responsive, strong underfoot comfort, true neutral stability, fun and useful heel tab, great traction for a road shoe
Affordable, reliable, more breathable than previous versions, well-tractioned
Stable, suitable for cool weather running, reliable, solid traction
Comfortable, great stability, lots of width options, equipped for distance
Great underfoot cushion, well-tractioned, perfect for mellow mileage, ultra-stable
Solid underfoot cushion, more responsive and stable than expected
Versatile, familiar fit, great daily trainer
Ultra-padded, breathable, soft upper and lace bed
Great stability for a high stack shoe, recovery day ready, comfortable, surprisingly responsive
Comfortable, sturdy, upper conforms to your foot shape, stylish
Super plush, durable build, stable
Cons
Less versatile, very expensive, lacks upper comfort
Expensive, poor traction in certain conditions
Narrow midfoot, not the most well-cushioned
Prohibitively priced, lacks versatility, high arch won't suit all runners, lacks stability
Moderate stability, upper textile is scratchy, lacks structure
Imposing rocker, crowded toe box, expensive, lacks stability
Upper material stains quickly, some runners might desire more cushion, traction is not suitable for wet conditions
Lacks stability, not versatile as a daily trainer
Runs short, expensive, lacks versatility
Slightly expensive, less stable
Heavy for a speed shoe, middling traction
Less responsive than some, collar won't be comfortable on all runners, basic upper through forefoot
Low volume toe box, not the best propulsion
Flimsy tongue, iffy upper comfort, zero drop shoes aren't for everyone
On the expensive side, low-drop won't suit all runners, not as wide as other Altra shoes
Bounce doesn't translate to speed, differential feels steep
Just "okay" at everything
Lacks traction on slick surfaces, thick heel might not be universally enjoyed
Upper lacks comfort, strange lacing system, runs large
Lacks tech, not built for speed
Clunky-feeling outsole, lacks breathability, not responsive
Might be too structured for some, heavier
Heavy, lacks versatility
Lacks versatility, somewhat clunky, heavy
Heavier than some, less techy
Spongy underfoot feel, heavy, lacks responsiveness, less stable
Expensive, high stack won't appeal to all runners, heavy
Heavy, less responsive, less versatile
Less responsive, maximal design won't suit everyone, uncomfortable upper, narrower than past iterations
Bottom Line
This speed-focused road shoe is what you want if you are chasing PRs, Strava segments, or pushing your limits
This smooth-riding, lightweight, and powerful race-day shoe, with its explosive midsole and natural feel
This budget-friendly buy is versatile and lightweight enough to encompass race days and social runs comfortably
This speed-oriented racing shoe is designed for those with a need for speed who are looking to enhance their shoe collections with a high-performance addition
This shoe offers strong responsiveness and an ultra-lightweight ride
This softer take on a super shoe lacks stability at slower speeds, but will help you crush your PRS if its fit feels comfortable
This versatile shoe is perfect for training runs of all styles and distances
This shoe combines stylish design with enhanced functionality, featuring a lightweight build, making it a comfortable choice for daily runners seeking a blend of fashion and performance
Built for speed and efficiency, this shoe combines a high stack, low drop, and a redesigned carbon fiber plate to propel runners forward, delivering a comfortable race-ready shoe
A very-improved running shoe that is perfect for racing and training runs of all kinds
We recommend this low-tech hybrid running shoe for smooth comfort, stability, and easy propulsion
With a thick underfoot stack and an ability to conform to your foot shape, this is a comfortable shoe for moderately-paced daily
This shoe offers a neutrally enjoyable take on combining speed and comfort
This comfortable and stable shoe is a great choice if a zero drop road shoe is calling your name
Perhaps not a universally-beloved runner, this low-drop, natural-feeling shoe is great for uptempo runs that roll right into lifting sessions
With its towering stack and ample cushioning, this bouncy shoe delivers a cushy ride for heel-strikers at moderate paces but doesn't support more ambitious speed goals
A versatile and affordable running shoe that holds its own but doesn't excel in any area
With its blend of performance technology and comfort, this running shoe will be your first choice for all run types
This shoe is responsive enough for solid paces, though it lacks some of the comfort features some runners crave
With a 10 mm drop, this updated version is as reliable, stable, and perfect for moderate running as ever
This revamped shoe provides extra cushioning but falls short for speed, making it suitable for leisurely walks rather than high-paced runs
This traditional running shoe comes equipped with everything distance runners need to find comfort and strength during long training runs
A great recovery day shoe, this stable and cushion-stuffed shoe is a dream come true for mellow mileage
Featuring an impressive stack and underfoot chunk, this shoe is ideal for leisurely efforts
A solid, if heavy, daily trainer for runners looking for a shoe that is well-suited to lots of different run types
While these heavily cushioned shoes provide comfort during extended runs, they fall short in terms of versatility
This uniquely designed shoe, with a high stack and rigid PEBA foam, offers ample cushioning and comfort for runners who want a supportive yet non-super shoe feel
This clunky workhorse of a shoe conforms to your feet and holds up to the demands of marathon training
If you are looking for an ultra-cushioned shoe to help protect your joints, the underfoot stack of this shoe is built for you
Measured Heel-to-Toe Drop: 8 mm | Weight (per shoe, size 6.5): 7.36 oz
REASONS TO BUY
Springy
Comfortable
Versatile
Well-balanced
REASONS TO AVOID
Poor traction
Somewhat heavy
The Asics Novablast 4 is a standard-fitting, versatile running shoe that rides significantly better than most. From its trampoline-effect midsole to its agile 8 mm drop to its geometric outsole, this exciting running shoe will take you through your training in comfort. Asics masterfully combined the traits of a maximally cushioned shoe that readily absorbs impacts with a non-plated midsole that provides powerful energy return and a more aggressive rocker angle and location (we measured 25.0 degrees, 69.5% forward from the heel), making this a great shoe for runners and runs of all types. If you're trying to pick up the pace a bit, the Brooks Hyperion Max 2 takes things up a notch with a full-length plastic plate that makes it a bit snappier. It's not quite as comfortable and cushioned as the Novablast, but it strikes a very good balance of speed and comfort. While the Novablast houses a pretty chunky-looking design in its 38 mm stack, its lightweight materials prevent it from feeling too thick or imbalanced underfoot. Everyone on our testing team loved this shoe, from speed workouts to long-distance cruises.
As with many road-specific shoes, the Asics Novablast 4 lacks the traction necessary for slick, wintery surfaces. The Novablast does everything well except for gripping a damp road, taking it out of contention as a crossover shoe for trails. If you need more traction but still want this level of comfort, the Asics Gel-Kayano 31 might be more what you're looking for. The Novablast is also on the heavier side of things, weighing 7.36 ounces per shoe (size 6.5). Though it doesn't feel as clunky as that weight makes it sound, runners looking to cut shoe weight may appreciate the Hoka Mach 6 a bit more. The Mach 6 is nearly as good as the Novablast, making it a very versatile shoe, but weighs just 6.27 ounces per shoe. Still, knowing that the Novablast offers a balanced ride with bouncy energy return, we'll gladly tote around the extra few ounces. Runners needing a single high-performing shoe will enjoy the pep, comfort, and look of the updated Novablast.
Measured Heel-to-Toe Drop: 3 mm | Weight (per shoe, size 6.5): 5.44 oz
REASONS TO BUY
Lightweight
Peppy
Versatile
REASONS TO AVOID
Narrow midfoot
Lacks lateral stability
The Saucony Kinvara 15 is a versatile road running shoe available for less than many of our other top contenders, making it a high-value option. With a peppy PWRRUN foam midsole and ultra-lightweight build — just 5.44 ounces per size 6.5 shoe! — the Kinvara feels nearly weightless during runs. Even with just 27 mm of heel stack, it's cushioned well enough for long distances, but its flexible responsiveness and aggressive rocker apex (just 64.7% forward from the heel) lend themselves beautifully to workouts when you want to pick up the pace. Built to be minimalistic, runners who want a lightweight, no-frills running shoe with a solid ground feel will feel right at home in the updated Kinvara. We solidly recommend the Kinvara not only because of its fantastic price point but also because of its versatile structure.
The Kinvara is a lightweight shoe, meaning it lacks the lateral stability found in some of its heavier counterparts. Runners seeking stability or a super plush feeling on top of their feet may find the minimal build of this shoe lacking. The Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 is our top recommendation for stability, boasting more lateral support and better upper comfort than the Kinvara. The outsole of the Kinvara is a bit foamier than some, making it a poor choice for crossing over into gnarlier terrain. But if you are searching for a versatile shoe with a wallet-friendly price, we still feel the Kinvara is the best value.
We have also tested the previous version of this shoe, the Kinvara 14. While there are a few notable changes, which we outline in our individual review, the older Kinvara scored almost as high as the new iteration. You may be able to find it at a discounted price from some retailers, getting an even better bang for your buck from this already affordable shoe.
Measured Heel-to-Toe Drop: 6 mm | Weight (per shoe, size 6.5): 5.10 oz
REASONS TO BUY
Well balanced comfort
More stability than most super shoes
Natural-feeling rocker
Lightweight
REASONS TO AVOID
Lacks versatility
Very little traction
Very expensive
The Asis Metaspeed Sky Paris rose to the top of our collection of super shoes because of its balance between powerful propulsion and stability. The rocker apex placement of 68.0% forward from the heel leads to a natural-feeling stride, while the more aggressive 26.5-degree rocker angle helps generate more power as you run. The FF Blast Plus Eco midsole is energetic, adding to the overall fun of uptempo runs in this shoe. The Nike Alphafly 3 offers even more energy return, but dialing in the specific stride and speed necessary to take advantage of the Alphafly is more complicated than the straightforwardness of the Metaspeed Sky Paris. At only 5.10 ounces per women's size 6.5 shoe, the Metaspeed truly feels weightless as you run. Its notched laces ensure that you won't have to stop midrace to retire your shoe — a feature needed to propel yourself into PR territory.
As with many race-centered shoes, our biggest gripe with the Asics Metaspeed Sky Paris is that it is very expensive. Though not the highest-priced racing shoe in our lineup, its price is high enough to turn many runners off. In that vein, niche, high-priced shoes also lack the value of some of the more versatile and affordable options. The Nike Vaporfly 3 is arguably more responsive and weighs even less than the Metaspeed Sky but is less comfortable and less stable — and costs even more. The Saucony Endorphin Speed 4 is a more affordable speed shoe that isn't quite on par with top racing tech but still provides a well-rounded, uptempo shoe that's great for speed training. Overall, the Metaspeed stands out as an excellent pick for fast paces and PRs. We gladly recommend the Metaspeed as our top choice for runners seeking speed.
Measured Heel-to-Toe Drop: 8 mm | Weight (per shoe, size 6.5): 7.17 oz
REASONS TO BUY
Offers a balanced ride
Well-rounded comfort
Neutrally responsive
Stable
More affordable than most super shoes
REASONS TO AVOID
Heavy for a speed shoe
Not the best traction
The Brooks Hyperion Max 2 stands out as one of the most well-rounded daily trainers in the Brooks lineup, offering a combination of comfort, responsiveness, and propulsive features that make it a solid option for runners seeking a PR, but with comfort at the forefront. The Saucony Endorphin Speed 4 is similarly comfortable and impressively propulsive. It weighs slightly less but is also noticeably less stable, though for a similar price. With the Hyperion Max's 35 mm heel stack, a full-length plastic plate, and a cushioned midsole, this shoe strikes the perfect balance between landing comfort and energy return, making it a dream for training days. The DNA Flash v2 midsole provides a forgiving, comfortable ride at variable paces, though its ride isn't quite as powerful as a true super shoe.
Topping our short list of complaints about the Hyperion is its very average traction. When we think about what we want in a daily training shoe, we often seek the versatility of traction to help keep us safe and our running terrain interesting. If you need better traction, the Puma Deviate Nitro 3 is another great contender, striking an excellent balance of comfort and propulsion at a similar price point. The Deviate Nitro offers the same emphasis on comfort and pep, making it a slightly more affordable performance shoe. Though it may not be the lightest or most propulsive option on the market, the Hyperion Max 2 shines with its cushioned outsole and responsive toe-offs, offering a smooth transition for runners aiming to accelerate their training. Ultimately, this shoe is a versatile workhorse that balances comfort and performance, making it a top pick for daily wear and race training.
Measured Heel-to-Toe Drop: 7 mm | Weight (per shoe, size 6.5): 6.27 oz
REASONS TO BUY
Incredible versatility
Lightweight and fun
Balanced across all metrics
Affordable
REASONS TO AVOID
Look beat up quickly
Some runners might want more cushion out of their daily trainer
The Hoka Mach 6 is our top pick for runners looking for a versatile daily trainer. A women's size 6.5 shoe weighs just 6.27 ounces, making it a lightweight choice for everyday wear. Its airy midsole and snug upper mesh create a custom-feeling fit that is perfect for long-distance days, uptempo runs, and even casual weekend outings. The outsole is responsive enough for hopping into high gear when you want, while the Supercritical EVA midsole handles pavement-pounding LSD (long slow distance) days like a pro. The magic of the Mach lies in its balance. It scores well across nearly all of our metrics, making it a comfortable and balanced road running shoe that most runners could find speedy success in.
One gripe we have with the updated Mach 6 is that the engineered mesh of the upper stains incredibly easily. Running shoes cost a lot of money, so we prefer when their uppers defect stains a little bit better. However, in its versatility, the Mach 6 falls short on some specialty features. Runners searching for plush road shoes will find the Mach to be a bit too rigid, and runners seeking a super shoe will find that the Mach doesn't have as aggressive of a responsive snap as others. The New Balance Rebel v4 is a comparative shoe that didn't score quite as high as the Mach among female testers, but our male testers preferred the Rebel's wider platform and fit. Overall, the Mach is a shoe that we would recommend to most runners because of its versatile balance, wide-ranging comfort, and more accessible price point.
Measured Heel-to-Toe Drop: 7 mm | Weight (per shoe, size 6.5): 7.26 oz
REASONS TO BUY
Low-profile design
Energetic midsole
Versatile
REASONS TO AVOID
Not a universally comfortable design
Pricey
The Altra Vanish Tempo excels in several areas, making it a great option for runners seeking uncomplicated versatility. With a nitrogen-infused midsole and a strong midfoot lock, the shoe offers comfort during uptempo runs, recovery miles, and even gym workouts. Weighing 7.26 ounces, it's on the lightweight side and provides a trampoline-like midsole bounce that enhances running efficiency. Altra's definition of “zero-drop” — heel and forefoot on the same level while standing at a neutral position — still applies to the Vanish Tempo, but the forefoot stack is actually 7 mm thinner than the heel, adding extra propulsion to this road shoe. The Vanish Tempo retains Altra's signature low drop, and although it features a more subdued version of the wide toe box, it still delivers a comfortable, minimalistic feel that will appeal to those looking for a flexible training shoe with racing potential.
The Altra Vanish Tempo low drop mechanics may not suit everyone, which is a notable drawback, though the actual stack heights of this shoe may help mitigate that transition for runners not already used to zero-drop shoes. If that's still not your speed, the Saucony Kinvara 15 is fairly minimalist and has a similar flexibility to the Vanish Tempo. Altra purists might be disappointed by the Vanish Tempo's slimmer fit, which strays from the brand's traditional wide “foot shape” design. Speed-focused runners looking for a propulsive shoe to maximize race-day performance may find the Vanish Tempo's plate-free flexibility limiting when it comes to achieving top speeds. The Saucony Endorphin Speed 4 includes a full-length plastic plate while maintaining a similar soft bounce to the Vanish Tempo. Overall, the Vanish Tempo is a well-rounded, low-profile shoe that can stand up to the demands of daily road running.
Measured Heel-to-Toe Drop: 10 mm | Weight (per shoe, size 6.5): 8.21 oz
REASONS TO BUY
Comfortable
Stable
Affordable
Many width options available
REASONS TO AVOID
Less responsive
May feel overbuilt for some
The improved Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 is an upgraded version of a reliable favorite. With built-in GuideRails, a DNA Loft midsole, and enough upper comfort for long, steamy runs, this is one of our top recommendations for runners seeking a more stable platform to cruise on. The GuideRails offer strong lateral support, making this a great shoe for runners who tend to overpronate. The Adrenaline fits like a classic road running shoe, adding an element of familiarity to one of Brooks' most popular lines. It's a durable, marathon-worthy shoe with above-average traction and stability at its heart, and we love what the Adrenaline 23 has to offer.
For some, the slight rigidity of the Adrenaline's lateral edges might be more noticeable than is preferred, particularly if you aren't an overpronator. We also love the stability of the Gel-Kayano 31, which is less responsive at speed but has even more comfortable cushioning underfoot. Still, the Adrenaline is a great option for distance efforts, and its weight and responsiveness reflect this. While not a sprinting shoe, we feel the benefits outweigh the drawbacks — and we found ourselves also enjoying this shoe for long walking days. If reliability, comfort, and a bit of support are what you're after, we wholeheartedly recommend the updated Adrenaline 23.
If a true stability shoe is what you are after, but you can't resist a good deal, you may want to consider the Adrenaline GTS 22. We included the older version of this shoe in previous rounds of testing and recommended it then and now for its cushy platform and reliable stability features. Since it is a past-season model, you can likely find it at a discount from some retailers while it is still available.
Compare Products
How We Test Women's Road Running Shoes
Over the last decade, our running experts have tested over 120 pairs of the most popular running shoes. Before kicking off our testing, we extensively researched the market, spending hours comparing features, materials, and fit to help you find the best options out there. Once our lineup was solidified, we tested these running shoes for several months, where we truly put them through the wringer. We subjected every single contender to over 30 miles of running — most for far more, over the course of additional months — running hard and far to find which kicks can hold up and which aren't worth the time. We ran on various terrains, such as pavement, beaches, tracks for speed workouts, and dirt trails. Yes, our legs are tired, but we wouldn't have it any other way.
What About Stack Height?
We take our own stack height measurements for the shoes, and we test and calculate the heel-toe drop differential using these measurements. You may notice that our reported measurements sometimes differ from the numbers presented by manufacturers. Scratching your head? This is because there is no true industry standard for measuring the stack height of running shoes. Each company can choose how to take these measurements without disclosing their methods. We cut each shoe in half on a band saw and take standardized measurements based on the World Athletics requirements. With this information, we can give you a more accurate comparison between models. Our stack height and subsequent heel-toe drop calculations include the insole, midsole, and outer tread — in other words, everything that is underneath your foot while you are wearing the shoe.
Beyond just testing road running shoes out in the field, we cut them open and assess what they are made of in our lab. We measure and remeasure stack heights, outsole thicknesses, heel-to-toe differentials, and dozens of other things to see if they match what the manufacturers claim. In many cases, we found slight discrepancies, which we note in our reviews and use to further inform our testing process.
Our tests are grouped into five weighted rating metrics:
Landing Comfort (30% of overall score weighting)
Responsiveness (20% weighting)
Stability (15% weighting)
Upper Comfort (15% weighting)
Weight (15% weighting)
Traction (5% weighting)
Why Trust GearLab
We've compiled a team of experts and inquisitive-minded people to get to the bottom of what makes a women's road running shoe great. Our lead road running tester is exercise specialist, Ally Arcuri. She is an avid runner, fitness junkie, cancer survivor, accomplished ultramarathoner, PE teacher, and yoga teacher. Ally has broken tape at quite a few middle-distance races and intends to win more now that her cancer journey is behind her. You can find Ally and her dog out running, from open roads to beaches to trails. Her years of work in physical therapy help guide her through the sea of running gear available, and a degree in kinesiology provides valuable scientific insight. Running biomechanics expert and consultant, Carrie Vickers also contributed to our test plan and advice on choosing your best running shoes. Carrie is an accomplished runner, having placed in numerous US National, Olympic, and World running events. She set the record in the 2000 meter steeplechase (though it has since been broken) and is one of the primary architects of our ]jogging stroller review. In the lab, manufacturing engineer Sentry Kelly leads the charge to cut open, scrutinize, and measure every pair we test to offer comparable, standardized results.
We take notes on the on-foot feel of every model during our runs and then take in-lab measurements to compare each shoe.
Analysis and Test Results
Whether you're training for a marathon or walking your dog, picking the right shoe for your needs can be challenging. Recent advancements in materials and design have led to a bewildering array of choices, with every company catering to a different need. Plus, the improvements made in traditional models, the progression toward minimalist or barefoot footwear, and the recent eruption of maximally cushioned products have added new layers of complexity. Luckily, we are here to help you make sense of it all and guide you towards finding your new running mate.
Before diving in, it's important to decide if road-specific running shoes are the best choice for you. If you run primarily on roads, sidewalks, the treadmill, or a track, you are in the right spot. Even if you take an occasional cruise through dirt roads and light cross-country trails, a road-running shoe will likely be your best option. If you are more interested in bombing down rocky trails, our lineup of epic trail running shoes will have better options for you, many of which crossover onto roads beautifully.
What's the Best Value?
At GearLab, we buy all of our products at retail prices just like you and have our testing team put them through an aggressive battery of tests without looking at the price tag. We consider the price only after accurately and fairly scoring each pair of shoes across our metrics. We've found that value, durability, and versatility go hand-in-hand. If a shoe only performs well in one situation, its value is often lower than a more well-rounded option. Some shoes are designed for very specific purposes, like the race-ready (and very expensive) Nike Alphafly3. It is up to you to determine if you want to invest in one versatile, high-value shoe or in an array of kicks with different strengths.
The Saucony Kinvara 14 is at the top of our list when it comes to value. Available for less than many of the other shoes on the market, its comfort and versatility solidify its standing. The Asics Novablast 4 is another excellent choice in terms of value. Though it costs more than the Kinvara, it is highly versatile and one of the top-performing pairs across all our tests. It's a shoe that you can wear daily — or in most situations — and has the makings of a fantastic value.
We also take a keen look at each shoe's versatility. Our top choice for versatility is the Hoka Mach 6 because it excels in a myriad of situations. For runners looking to purchase only a single shoe, value and versatility are important to consider. When looking for versatility, we generally assess how each shoe stacks up across our metrics as a whole. If the shoe scores incredibly high in one metric but low in another, that is a clue that it lacks versatility. If a shoe scores relatively high across the board, like the Mach 6, it generally means that the shoe is more versatile.
Landing Comfort
Whether you run a few miles a year or are tied to a rigorous training schedule, it's called “pounding pavement” for a reason. With that pounding in mind, our testers consider this metric one of the most important evaluation criteria for road-focused running shoes.
Nothing makes someone want to stop running more than tired, blistered feet or achy joints, so we used this category to judge a few different shoe traits. We review the ability to cushion the feet and provide adequate shock absorption for each contender. We also compare the construction of midsoles and materials through feel and by cutting each pair open in our lab. Deconstructing each pair in this way gave us a holistic view of what each shoe is made of and how well each holds up to the manufacturers' claims of underfoot cushion. We get to know each shoe and assess its ideal running scenarios, noting whether it is built for long runs or speed workouts (or neither).
Landing Comfort: Daily Trainers
Ranging from around 25 mm to 40 mm of heel stack, daily trainers are meant to be worn daily, necessitating well-executed underfoot cushion. While not as thickly stacked as many of the maximally cushioned shoes, daily trainers typically provide a comfortable dose of underfoot cushion without going overboard. We tend to describe these shoes as more “traditional fitting” in that they ride like trusty, familiar road steeds.
The Asics Novablast 4 is our highest-scoring daily trainer when it comes to landing comfort and cushioning. Though this shoe shines across the board, it earned exceptional marks in this metric because of its 38 mm heel stack, traditional 8 mm drop (as measured by our in-house specs wizards), and bouncy FF Blast Plus Eco midsole. Day after day, the Novablast is a shoe that our testers want to run in because of the ease and comfort it offers.
The Hoka Mach 6 is another strong contender in this metric, though it rides slightly differently than the others. Its undercarriage is comprised of supercritical EVA foam and rubber, which leads to a lightweight springiness that is functional in most road running scenarios. In a similar vein, the Puma Deviate Nitro splits the difference between being a comfortable runner and a race-ready shoe. While not the most well-cushioned or propulsive, the Deviate Nitro toes the line between providing uptempo pep and comfortable cushion suitable for daily running.
The Asics Gel-Kayano 31 has a total stack of 38 mm and a forgiving FF Blast Eco midsole. The underfoot cushion, springy softness, and easy ride make this and its similarly-designed cousin, the Asics Gel Nimbus 26, perfect shoes for long recovery day runs.
Brooks makes a few honorable mentions in this metric. While most of their shoes don't tend to be the plumpest underfoot, they offer serious reliability, durability, and uncomplicated cushion. The Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 and the Brooks Ghost 16 both have midsoles stuffed with DNA Loft, a material that rebounds well without providing any unnecessary fluff underfoot. The Brooks Hyperion Max 2 earned an award for its solid balance between propulsion and underfoot comfort. Classified as a plated daily runner, the Hyperion has a comfortable DNA Flash v2 midsole and a full-length plastic plate. These elements marry to make a unique and delightful underfoot experience. The midsole provides the forgiving bounce that many runners desire out of their daily trainers, and the plate allows for strong energy return and propulsion. Moreover, the propulsive plate is made of plastic, which offers a softer ride than many of the carbon-plated options.
The Brooks Ghost (left) and Adrenaline (right) offer a decent amount of cushioning for daily trainers.
Landing Comfort: Maximally Cushioned Shoes
Many of the maximally cushioned shoes we tested scored incredibly high in this metric but lower in others, which reduced their overall ranking. And we have to hand it to many of these shoe manufacturers — it is tough to create a shoe that offers maximal landing cushion and responsiveness — especially since responsiveness and weight go hand-in-hand.
One of the most valiant efforts we have seen was executed by Hoka with the release of the Skyward X. The Skyward has a towering 43 mm heel stack, a 6 mm drop, a stability frame, and loads of lightweight PEBA foam. The resulting shoe is not soft and springy but burly in its joint protection and stable as can be. Runners who want a shoe with a resilient undercarriage that doesn't feel like a stack full of mush will enjoy the tall stack and ride that the Skyward X offers.
The Altra VIA Olympus 2 is another sky-high road running shoe that takes maximal style to new heights. Standing at 35 mm high with a 2 mm heel-to-toe drop, this shoe provides ample distance between your feet and the ground. Of course, the drawback of many of the maximally-cushioned shoes is their weight and lack of responsive energy return, but if you want to add a recovery day shoe to your running shoe arsenal, these high-stack runners are some of the best.
Landing Comfort: Race Shoes
We need to discuss how super shoes relate to landing comfort. Super shoes are race-specific shoes that are far from plush, daily trainers. The recent boom in super shoes has left runners weighing the differences between maximalist shoes and race-ready kicks that boast 40 mm+ of underfoot cushion. Many race shoes stand as high as maximally-cushioned shoes, but their insides are comprised of very different materials — they are not necessarily made to be run in every day. The landing experience in a race shoe is more like landing on a propulsive crash pad. We can liken this type of propulsion to a gymnast executing a vault in that there needs to be some spring shrouded in rigidity in order for the gymnast to take flight. The underfoot feel of most race shoes is firm, giving a delicious pop with each powerful footfall.
Each race shoe-seeking runner will have slightly different preferences when it comes to their racing shoes. Some runners prefer a more streamlined fit, while others want a bit of cushion for long-distance comfort. Some runners seek the lightest weight shoe on the market while others are inhibited by budget. Whichever camp you fall into, there is a super shoe out there for you, so long as you remember that the underfoot comfort is relative to its race prowess.
The Nike Alphafly 3 stands atop the highest echelon of propulsion and provides a whopping 38 mm of heel stack. It provides strong landing comfort for racing efforts. Its full-length carbon plate and ZoomX midsole are powerfully rigid, providing just enough give to keep joints comfortable during race efforts. The Alphafly's cousin, the Nike Vaporfly 3, has a less pronounced underfoot stack (32 mm in the heel) and offers nearly the same amount of pep. However, the 6 mm difference in underfoot material between these two models is noticeable when pounding the pavement.
Similarly, the Asics Metaspeed Sky Paris offers powerful propulsion and energy return thanks to its carbon plate and FF Turbo Plus midsole. With a total stack of 38 mm and a 6 mm drop, the balance between height and rigid propulsion architecture is spot-on. This, among other reasons, is why the Metaspeed Sky Paris is our go-to recommendation for runners seeking a speed shoe.
The Saucony Endorphin Speed 4 is an honorable mention when it comes to racing in prime underfoot comfort. The Endorphin is an entry-level super shoe with a full-length nylon plate, which is slightly more forgiving than the powerful carbon plates. This shoe is part daily runner and part race shoe, which is part of why it provides balanced comfort and speed.
Responsiveness
Responsiveness describes how a shoe responds to the energy you put into it, how quickly and efficiently your feet travel through the motions of each stride, and how agile you feel doing so. Often, but not always, the higher a shoe scores in responsiveness, the lower it scores in landing comfort, and vice versa. The thicker and softer cushioning that increases landing comfort can sometimes make a shoe feel spongy and hinder responsiveness. This is something to consider when prioritizing shoe features.
Manufacturers have greatly increased the balance of cushioning and responsiveness in ultra-comfy kicks through new technologically advanced foams, materials, and shoe geometry. While individual foot shape and muscle composition can dictate how agile a runner may feel in a certain pair of shoes, certain patterns and indicators help us generalize our assessment of this complicated metric.
In addition to feeling out responsiveness through miles on the road, we measure the rocker angle and rocker apex location in our lab to gauge how much of a forward roll it will provide. The more dramatic the forward roll, the more responsive the shoe feels as each footfall rolls into the next. The most responsive shoes in our lineup virtually all have plates embedded into their soles, which provide a strong launchpad for runners. Typically, these plates are made of carbon and run the entire length of the insole.
Responsiveness: Daily Trainers
Daily trainers aren't the most responsive shoes on the market. Daily trainers are made for daily running and vary in their speed prowess. Ultimately, the goal of a daily trainer is to be a shoe you run in… daily. Many of the most responsive shoes are too rigid to provide comfortable daily runs and postural support.
Shoe Responsiveness Over Varying Effort Levels
Product
Easy (Recovery)
Moderate (Marathon)
Threshold (10K)
Fast (5K)
Saucony Endorphin Speed 4
4
4
4
4
Brooks Hyperion Max 2
4.5
4
3.5
3.5
Puma Deviate Nitro 3
4
4
3.5
3.5
Saucony Kinvara 15
3
4
4
4
Asics Novablast 4
5
4
3
3
New Balance FuelCell Rebel v4
3
4
4
3
Hoka Mach 6
4
4
3
3
Hoka Clifton 9
4
3
2
2
Adidas Adizero Boston 12
3.5
3
2.5
2
Adidas Supernova Rise
3.5
3
2
2
Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23
4
2
2
2
Lululemon Blissfeel 2
3
2.5
2
2
Asics Gel-Kayano 31
3
2.5
2
1.5
Altra Torin 7
3.5
3
1
1
Reebok Floatride Energy 5
3
2.5
2
1
Brooks Glycerin 21
2.5
2
1
1
Brooks Ghost 16
2.5
2
1
1
Asics Gel-Nimbus 26
2
2
1
1
Daily trainers cover a wide range of possible uses and some are better able to cross over into your next race than others.
In the case of the Saucony Endorphin Speed 4 and the Brooks Hyperion Max 2, the plates are made of nylon and plastic, respectively, providing some of the most accommodating underfoot rides in the realm of racing. Instead of simply absorbing the impact, these plates propel the body forward, ensuring that the energy put into each footfall is returned. In the realm of daily trainers, plates are not abundantly common. While some exist, the large majority of daily runners don't have propulsive plates.
The Saucony Kinvara 15 is a lightweight, minimalistically designed shoe that fits into the “responsive for a daily trainer” category. With a 25.0-degree rocker angle and a PWRRUN midsole, the Kinvara's foamy midsole offers more pep than most daily trainers. It has enough power and roll to propel you through training and racing without having to buy additional footwear.
The Hoka Mach 6 is similar in that it offers near-weightless-feeling underfoot materials, a comfortable roll, and tempo versatility. We love running shoes (of all kinds, really) that can be worn daily on different types of runs, and the Mach 6's supercritical EVA midsole always takes us to the edge.
If you want a shoe that will help you get moving but want to shy away from plated kicks, we don't hesitate to recommend the Asics Novablast 4. This shoe is an example of what a perfectly executed balance looks like in the world of running shoes. It is lightweight and comfortable for all-day excursions but offers spring when you need it without the addition of a carbon-fiber plate. The New Balance FuelCell Rebel v4 is a relatively propulsive shoe without a plate. Its incredibly lightweight build, geometric design, and 24-degree rocker angle are perfect for regular uptempo runs.
Responsiveness: Maximally Cushioned Shoes
Maximally cushioned shoes and responsiveness go together about as well as peanut butter and tuna. In rare cases, you can get rolling in a maximalist shoe, but the odds aren't typically in your favor. The thickness of the stack, the lack of underfoot rigidity, and the overall weight of maximally cushioned shoes tend to inhibit true speed. Many runners execute their long training runs in these comfortable-style shoes but opt for more energetic options when it comes time to PR. If ultra-plush shoes are your jam, there isn't really a reason why you shouldn't run in them, especially if you value comfort over speed and power.
Shoe Responsiveness Over Varying Effort Levels
Product
Easy (Recovery)
Moderate (Marathon)
Threshold (10K)
Fast (5K)
Mizuno Neo Vista
3.5
4
3
3
Hoka Skyward X
4
4
3
2
ON Cloudsurfer 7
3.5
3
2
1.5
Altra Via Olympus 2
4
2
1
1
Hoka Bondi 8
2
2
1
1
Shoes designed with cushion in mind may let you finish the race but are unlikely to score you a spot on the podium.
The thick, stiff cushion of the Hoka Skyward X offers a moderate amount of propulsion. This is in part because of its two-piece carbon fiber plate. This shoe flips the script when it comes to how runners think about maximal cushion and responsiveness. While uncommon, it offers a surprising balance of these two elements. Along these same lines, The Mizuno Neo Vista was designed as a shoe for reaching top speeds in. But because of its 44 mm (yes, seriously) heel stack, plate, and plush Energy Nxt midsole, it offers some springy rebound and comfort.
Responsiveness: Race Shoes
Responsiveness is where race shoes really shine. Super shoes are made to be fast above all else, and the current shoe market is loaded with powerhouses ready to help you PR. While a race shoe isn't necessary for average running, it makes track workouts fun, personal records more competitive, and speed more accessible.
Shoe Responsiveness Over Varying Effort Levels
Product
Easy (Recovery)
Moderate (Marathon)
Threshold (10K)
Fast (5K)
Asics Metaspeed Sky Paris
3
4.5
5
5
New Balance FuelCell SuperComp Elite v4
3
4
5
5
Altra Vanish Tempo
5
4
3.5
3.5
Comparing the responsiveness of racing shoes over different distance speeds, with exciting results.
The Nike Alphafly 3 is the most responsive shoe we tested this season, with the Metaspeed following closely behind. With sleek yet slightly different shapes and powerful outsoles, these are the shoes we recommend to runners looking to tackle speedwork and set PRs. The New Balance FuelCell SuperComp Elite V4 scored just as well as the aforementioned super shoes in this metric. The SuperComp Elite features a serious rocker, a low weight, and a geometric design that is made for powerful toeoffs.
The Saucony Endorphin Pro 4 is another ultra-responsive shoe that can help you reach that elusive PR. Similar to the more comfortable Saucony Endorphin Speed 4, these aerodynamically designed workhorses are lightweight and ready to fly around the track when you are.
Many runners prefer zero-drop differentials, though low-drop shoes tend to feel less responsive. This is, in part, because they feature flatter rockers than the more banana-shaped shoes on the market. A notable exception is the Altra Vanish Tempo. Sans a propulsive plate, this low-drop shoe is made for racing. Though our in-house testers measured a 7 mm drop, Altra still markets this as a “zero-drop” shoe, which they define as heel and forefoot on the same plane when standing in a neutral position. That's true of these shoes, though with an aggressive rocker apex at just 65.0% of the shoe's length forward from the heel, the forefoot stack height is actually 7 mm thinner than the heel — hence our measurements. All those complications and definitions aside, our field testers can't stop singing praises about the Vanish Tempo's midsole rebound. With energy, pep, and a fun trampoline bounce, the Vanish Tempo is our top recommendation for runners seeking a low-drop, plateless racer.
Stability
Stability is another crucial metric in the world of running. When referencing stability, we are talking about the lateral stability a shoe offers. Lateral stability is significant for runners who tend to over or underpronate while running. When looking for a stability-focused shoe, it is crucial to assess the lateral structures within the shoe. If you notice that the edge of a shoe is made entirely of mesh, this is likely not a shoe centered around stability.
Overpronation can be caused by weak glute muscles, unstable ankles, or years of training with an inefficient gait pattern. If you find your ankles rolling in slightly while on the run, we recommend trying out a pair of running shoes made specifically to correct this postural misalignment.
Over time, small imbalances can lead to huge, lingering injuries. Running shoe manufacturers add structural support by reinforcing the lateral midsole of their shoes. Sometimes, they insert more rigid materials to stabilize the shoe and promote proper foot alignment through the stride.
In general, we have found that stability-increasing structures and weight are at odds, but the extra ounces are often worth a lifetime of proper running form. Many speed shoes lack stability, so it is up to you to determine whether you want a lineup of shoes or just one pair. If possible, we recommend having a pair for long, daily runs and a more responsive pair for speed work and racing. Of course, it isn't always an option to purchase and tote around multiple pairs. In that case, opting for something with an appropriate balance of responsive energy return and stability is the way to go.
Stability: Daily Trainers
The Brooks Adrenaline and the Asics Gel-Kayano 31 are two of our top recommendations when it comes to lateral stability. The former has built-in structures to encourage proper gait patterning, and the latter has a bulbous heel shape that helps correct wonky strides. The Gel Kayano's 4D Guidance System helps ensure smooth, even gait patterns. Its plush 38 mm stack helps make the Kayano one of our top recommendations for runners who view stability and underfoot comfort as their first priorities.
The Altra Torin 7 is a super stable shoe that earned its merits here by providing a zero-drop differential instead of extra structures. By forcing the heel to ride in line with the toe (though the heel stack is 1 mm thicker, as we measured in our lab), the body can rely on the rear musculature for additional strength and security. Zero-drop shoes are not for all runners, but they are fantastic for those prone to rolling their ankles because the shape helps prevent it.
In addition to the Torin, the Brooks Ghost 16 and the Hoka Clifton 9 are both honorable mentions in this metric as well. Even without specified structures, all three pairs provide balanced structure and comfort. The speed-focused daily trainers that offer the best stability manage to combine a bit of meat with their plates. Shoes such as the Brooks Hyperion Max 2 and the Puma Deviate Nitro 3 fit this bill.
Stability: Maximally Cushioned Shoes
The Hoka Skyward X truly offers everything most runners could want in a maximally cushioned shoe. This shoe features an H-shaped inlay for stability, making its high stack incredibly safe and secure. The Skyward's wide base of support helps ensure even more confidence for runners seeking the ultimate stability experience.
Stability: Race Shoes
Race shoes are not known for being particularly stable. As such, runners who need lateral support may avoid buying speed-centered shoes. Often, race shoes have thin, stuctureless side walls and narrow heels. These design components help keep weight low and forward motion high. The Asics Metaspeed Sky Paris and the New Balance FuelCell SuperComp Elite v4 are tied for the most stable super shoes. Neither one offers corrective structures, but both have strong midfoot locks that help inspire confidence. Both heel collars are comfortably snug, which helps balance out their moderately high stacks.
Upper Comfort
Aside from style, the first thing we notice about a shoe is its upper comfort. We are highly picky about how the tongue and lace combo touches our feet — nobody wants the lace bed digging into the top of their foot — so we weed out the aggressive from the smooth. The flexibility of materials, toe box shape, and overall upper design and construction all play into this, ideally coalescing in a shoe that lets you forget you're even wearing it. Feet often swell as your running heats up, so tight and unforgiving laces that obstruct blood flow are a sure way for a shoe to get a lower score in this area.
When evaluating upper comfort, we also note the midfoot's shape and style. Race shoes tend to have narrower bodies for speed, while maximally cushioned shoes offer a bit more wiggle room. Daily trainers sit somewhere in between on the width spectrum.
Toe boxes are relevant here, too, as they can make or break the perceived comfort of a running shoe. Many chunky, maximally-padded shoes offer slightly more toe box real estate, leading to higher scores. Of course, your favorite upper comfort design may not jive with ours. We assess each of the upper's elements to determine how likely they are to suit the majority of runners, taking into account the nuances that exist with human anatomy.
Upper Comfort: Daily Trainers
As we have said, daily trainers typically do a great job of being really wearable shoes. In the case of upper comfort, they often offer breathability, well-placed cushion, and neutral, unintrusive design features.
The Asics Novablast 4 is one of our highest-ranked shoes in the upper comfort metric. Its upper is made of engineered knit mesh, which is a popular textile for running shoe uppers. This material is lightweight, breathable, flexible, and nearly smooth enough to completely eradicate worry about blisters. In addition to the upper textile, the midfoot is moderately tapered, and the toe box is spacious enough to allow toes to splay without feeling clownlike. The Asics Gel Kayano 31 features a creamy texture to its upper. Though also made of engineered mesh, the upper is soft, smooth, and inviting in a way that many traditionally designed daily trainers are not.
The high-scoring Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 earned top marks in this category due to its familiar fit, comfortable weave, and variety of width options. The tongue of the Adrenaline is nearly half an inch thick, providing great comfort across the lace bed. Brooks seems to have nailed upper comfort in a traditional shoe shape, while Asics has devised newer, softer weaves for comfort in their uppers. The tongue of the Brooks Glycerin 21 stands out because of how plump and protective it is, which adds to its overall comfort. Its upper weave can be an asset or a drawback, depending on your perspective. Version 21 is a bit thicker and tighter than previous iterations of the Glycerin, making it run a bit warm. This is a fantastic attribute if the majority of your running takes place in colder climates, but it is an obvious drawback if your runs take you through warmer temperatures.
The Brooks Hyperion Max 2 has an upper that welcomes your feet like a portal to Narnia. The gusseted tongue is stretchy enough to accommodate comfort without adding upper bulk. The Saucony Endorphin Speed 4 is a speed-focused trainer with stretchy tongue gussets and breathable engineered mesh, offering the comfort of a daily trainer with the functionality of a moderate race shoe. While a low-volume shoe overall, the Puma Deviate Nitro 3 is a slightly chunkier speed-centric model with more comfort features. Its fit is not outstanding, but the softness, breathability of its upper, and well-placed cushion make for a more comfortable racing experience than some of the other super shoes.
The Lululemon Blissfeel 2 is a standout because of its unique-to-you upper. The knit of the upper textile conforms to your feet after just a few runs, providing a more tailored upper than most. The upper of the Blissfeel does run hot, though, which caused us to deduct a few points from its overall score. The upper of the Hoka Mach 6 molds around your foot in a similar way, providing upper comfort without feeling overly padded or bulky.
Upper Comfort: Maximally Cushioned Shoes
Maximally cushioned shoes often feature 360-degree cushioning, making them some of the highest-scoring options in the upper comfort metric. Unconcerned with weight, this style of road shoe tends to feature thick tongues, plump heel collars, and silky-smooth textiles for long-wear comfort. The Hoka Skyward X features a thickly comfortable tongue and lightweight cushioning all around the shoe. Combined with its breathability, it's relatively easy to wear day in and day out.
The ON Cloudsurfer and Hoka Bondi 8 are two relatively lower-scoring shoes that both provide adequate upper comfort. The Cloudsurfer offers a well-rounded plushness, though it does run a bit short. The Bondi is a thickly-stacked shoe with a well-padded tongue, but it runs slightly narrow.
Upper Comfort: Race Shoes
Race shoes are designed to be comfortable enough for long efforts without adding bulk. This is apparent in their upper comfort. In fact, most race shoes score lower than daily trainers in this metric because their uppers feature ultra-breathable mesh without comfort features or supports.
The notable exceptions in this metric are the shoes that straddle the line between racing shoes and plated daily trainers. This includes the likes of the Altra Vanish Tempo, whose upper also features ever-popular engineered mesh. The Vanish Tempo offers a streamlined version of Altra's iconic “footshape” design, which gives feet just enough space for comfortable running.
In terms of true racing shoes, the Asics Metaspeed Sky Paris is decently comfortable. True to racing shoe form, the Motion Wrap 2.0 mesh upper of this shoe is flexible, fabricky, and laden with holes for prime breathability. The Nike Alphafly 3 scored ever so slightly behind the Metaspeed. The AtomKnit upper and incredibly thin tongue are primed to be the ultimate racing machine, though its lack of upper cushion takes a bit of getting used to.
The New Balance FuelCell SuperComp Elite V4 earned relatively high marks here due to its breathability, comfortable heel collar, and lay-flat tongue. While none of the super shoes in our lineup offer comfort that can be compared with ultra-padded road shoes, these options can get you racing in relative comfort.
Weight
We can't deny that shoe weight affects running ability, but we caution against judging shoes based solely on this metric. This may be one of the first things we notice as we pull shoes out of the box, but this nuanced metric needs unpacking in ways that the other metrics don't.
Could a few ounces hold the key to your running success? It all depends on what your goals are. Unless elite-level racing is in your near future, we'd suggest using weight as a secondary or tertiary deciding factor after more noticeable criteria like upper and landing comfort. Once you've narrowed down your selection slightly, you might use weight to hone in on your final choice.
While thickly cushioned shoes may weigh a bit more, the tradeoff for the extra comfort may be worth it, depending on your running goals.
Weight: Daily Trainers
The Saucony Kinvara 15 is an extremely lightweight shoe (5.44 ounces per women's size 6.5 shoe). It is versatile and almost mindbogglingly cheaper than the ultralight race shoes in our lineup. If you want a lightweight shoe with some versatility, the Kinvara is worth considering. The Hoka Mach 6 is a fantastic option if you want combined levity and versatility with a side of speed. The 6.27-ounce Mach 6 rides like your most versatile speed shoe without pigeon-holing itself for races.
The New Balance FuelCell Rebel v4 is another notably lightweight shoe, weighing in at just 6.00 ounces per women's size 6.5 shoe. Of course, if a daily trainer is what you're after, the weight may not influence the performance you are looking for. Heavier shoes, like the 8.64-ounce Adidas Supernova Rise, provide plenty of comfort and performance even though they weigh a bit more than the average road running shoe.
Weight: Maximally Cushioned Shoes
Made to be maximally cushioned, most of the shoes in this category are on the heavier side of the spectrum. If you know that a max-padded road runner is perfect for you, don't let low scores in this metric dissuade you.
The ON Cloudsurfer is one of the more moderate maximally cushioned shoes in our lineup. Impressively, with a 36 mm heel stack, it weighs only 6.46 ounces. Though not an all-around high scorer, the cushion-to-weight ratio of this shoe makes it worth considering. The Hoka Bondi 8 is one of the lowest-scoring shoes in this metric, weighing in at 8.87 ounces per women's size 6.5 shoe. It feels a bit clunky to runners seeking to up their speed but it is still a good choice for slower recovery runs.
Weight: Race Shoes
Race shoes are designed to be lightweight — low weights and responsiveness tend to go hand-in-hand… As do ultra-technical textiles, carbon fiber plates, and, naturally, price.
The lightest shoe we tested is the Nike Vaporfly 3, which is one of the reasons why it makes a great race shoe. The Vaporfly weighs an astounding 4.98 ounces per women's size 6.5 shoe, making it feel nearly weightless as you run.
The Nike Alphafly 3 and the Asics Metaspeed Sky Paris are two other lightweight options made for flying. The Alphafly weighs 5.71 ounces and offers a bit more cushion and propulsion than the Vaporfly. The Metaspeed weighs 5.10 ounces (women's size 6.5) and fits more comfortably than the Vaporfly, allowing it to score notably higher.
When it comes to racing and tempo runs, it is up to you to decide on the weight-to-comfort ratio that works for your needs. The New Balance SuperComp FuelCell Elite V4, for example, weighs a bit more at 6.70 ounces per women's size 6.5 shoe. This weight comes with extra cushion, making it worth it to some runners.
Traction
The bulk of road shoes are designed for safety and security while running on paved surfaces. Some manufacturers keep traction-promoting elements to allow for increased speed and lowered weight. We test traction on wet and dry roads, on steep hills, and on gravel. We intentionally try to slide down rocks coated in sand at beaches and have found eucalyptus leaves to be especially slick for shoes without strong lugs. When assessing traction before purchasing, survey the outsole of the shoe in question. The deeper the lugs and the more texturized the surface, the better traction it typically provides.
Traction: Daily Trainers
By and large, daily trainers offer enough traction for daily running needs. Some shoes have more intricate lug patterns, making them suitable for very mild off-road excursions. Shoes with an emphasis on stability tend to provide a bit more traction, such as the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23. This shoe gives runners a varied and detailed lug pattern that can handle mild dirt paths, wet weather, and gravel corners with ease.
The Asics Gel Kayano 31 offers fantastic grip for a road shoe. While not necessarily up to trail shoe standards, this stability shoe is great for keeping you upright without slips. Its outsole is adorned with Asics Hybrid Grip, including its wide heel base. Because of these elements, the Gel Kayano is our top choice for runners seeking a well-tractioned road shoe. The Puma Deviate Nitro is a standout here as well. Though it's a daily trainer, this shoe is one of the few speed-focused models that boasts an excellently tractioned outsole.
The New Balance FuelCell Rebel v4 has grippier traction than many daily trainers, making it suitable for various conditions. The Altra Torin 7 and the Adidas Adizero Boston 12 both offer solid traction for moderately paced running. The Hoka Clifton has an outsole made of durabrasion rubber that provides excellent grip on tricky surfaces. While not entirely foolproof, this lightweight material helps provide security and grip around tight corners. The Brooks Ghost 16 gets an honorable mention here. With an outsole made of rubber that grips the road well in wet and dry conditions, this shoe is ready for any moderate running you throw at it.
Traction: Maximally Cushioned Shoes
The Altra Via Olympus 2 has excellent traction. Its rubber outsole is laid out in a pattern that follows the bones in your foot, adding extra security under iffy conditions like wet roads and slick grass. The Hoka Skyward X is another shoe that does well on most surface types. Its high abrasion rubber and stabilizing frame inspire confidence and control.
Traction: Race Shoes
Race shoes are not known for their traction. Many race shoes forego lugs and heavier materials in order to become super lightweight machines. Shoes like the Metaspeed Sky Paris and Nike Alphafly offer some forefoot texturization, though they tend to offer a bit less than more versatile options. Both of these shoes were a bit squirrely around corners and allowed some slippage on damp terrain. If traction is a major concern for you, we recommend seeking out a speed-focused daily trainer over a race shoe — like the Puma Deviate Nitro 3.
Conclusion
The footwear market, especially running shoes, is oversaturated with options and full of specialized lingo and misleading marketing. Therefore, finding the right model to add to your kit can be a huge and daunting task. We have an ongoing rotation of shoes being tested to help you find the right pair. From lightweight minimalist superstars to plush maximalist mileage hogs — and everything else in between. Have fun out there!