We buy all the products we test — no freebies from companies. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission, which helps support our testing.
We've logged many miles in the best women's trail running shoes from Salomon, Hoka, Altra, Saucony, Brooks, and more to help you find your perfect match
Our running enthusiasts have reviewed over 130 of the top trail running shoes for women since 2013, with 25 of the most popular options on the market in this current review. We log at least 60 miles in each pair, running day in and day out to bring you the most reliable information possible. From ultra-distance marathons to fast-packing adventures, we've embarked upon all manner of running adventures over the years to test these shoes head-to-head. We also weigh, measure, and chop up each shoe to scrutinize every detail — no matter how tiny — to provide you with solid recommendations you can trust.
To keep you prepared for all trail conditions, a good pair of running socks, women's running shorts, plus a breezy top are all recommended. If you plan to explore sandy or snowy trails, a pair of top-rated gaiters may also be a good accessory to have. If you're not sure that you need a trail-specific shoe, there are other women's running shoe styles we've tested, as well as our favorite running gear to get you out there.
Editor's Note: This review was updated on August 27, 2024, to include numerous new models to our lineup after our latest summer of trail testing and lab measuring.
Lacks sensitivity, not the most versatile, underfoot feel won't suit all runners
Heavy, lacks sensitivity
Lacks stability, not the most sensitive
Thick stack won't suit all runners, lacks responsiveness, no sensitivity
Bottom Line
For middle-distance trail runs, this featherweight shoe is ready to take on technical terrain with its great traction, supreme sensitivity, and adequate protection
This shoe is built for serious terrain, muddy weather, ultra distances, and everything in between
A great trail shoe that offers a streamlined fit with a grippy, confidence-inspiring outsole built to tackle the most technical terrain
With its updated upper and stable zero-drop design, this shoe maintains its reputation as a reliable and comfortable trail running shoe
A plush and responsive trail shoe that has great traction and is suitable for runners who like a wider fit
A great all-around trail shoe that hosts some of our favorite protective features, all for a relatively affordable price
With an aggressive outsole and exceptional protective features, this trail running shoe is a great choice for the sloppiest terrain
Featuring a spacious design, TPU plate, one-pull lace system, and an Energy Foam midsole, this shoe is tailored for speed-oriented trail running on moderate terrain
This shoe offers strong traction, well-placed cushion, and agility features, making it a great choice for trail runners seeking a lightweight and user-friendly option
While this trail shoe is packed with highly functional features, it falls a bit short in terms of comfort
This comfortable and familiar-feeling shoe is perfect for rugged trail runs because of its strength, traction, and flexible rock plate
If a versatile and comfortable trail shoe is what you are after, this well-tractioned and comfortably redesigned powerhouse is a solid choice
These pricey shoes are built to keep you comfortable and spry as you ratchet up your speed on moderate trails
An incredible bang for your buck, this affordable trail shoe comfortably holds up to the demands of light trail running
This versatile shoe isn't the most rugged, but it holds up to the demands of moderate trails and could be a great hiking shoe
This low-performing trail shoe lacks the lug depth, protection, and comfort that long-distance trail runners need
This trail shoe has the makings of a rugged trail superstar, but the pieces didn't quite come together for us
When you want to dig deep and tackle a trail, this protective and comfortable shoe will be with you for the long haul
A well-tractioned and high-performing moderate trail shoe that puts underfoot comfort at the center of its focus
This seriously fast and protective shoe is primed to be your race-day companion on technical, messy terrain
While well-featured, this uncomfortable shoe is not one we outright recommend
This race-focused shoe won't appeal to all folks, but its responsiveness, traction, and underfoot feel are great for speed-centered runners
A comfortable yet clunky trail shoe that is great for long runs and hikes when traction and comfort are the keys to success
This beautiful and well-tractioned shoe is suited for moderate trails that don't require a ton of agility
Runners looking for an ultra-plush trail experience may love what this shoe has to offer
Weight (per shoe): 9.11 oz | Measured Heel-to-Toe Drop: 7 mm
REASONS TO BUY
Ultra-sensitive
Fantastic traction
Ruggedly protective
Durable
REASONS TO AVOID
A bit heavy
Sensitivity takes time to adjust to
Dries slowly
The La Sportiva Bushido III has always been a sensitive and trail-ready running shoe. Its recent updates have catapulted it to the top, making it a trail shoe that we eagerly deem the best. With a ruggedly protective toe cap, well-tractioned outsole, and an intimate trail feel even with a rock plate, the Bushido is ready to tackle a variety of terrain types. Its 7 mm heel-toe drop and slightly wide heel create confidence that pairs well with its grippy Bi-Compound FriXion XT 2.0 V-Groove3 outsole. If you are seeking a durable, do-it-all trail shoe that will take your running endeavors to new heights, we do not hesitate to recommend this alpine-ready superstar.
The Bushdio III is on the heavier side, weighing in at just over 9 ounces per women's size 6.5 (US) shoe. This shoe packs a serious tactical punch, which makes it such a strong shoe, so we didn't mind the extra few ounces. This exceptional sensitivity of the Bushido takes a bit of time to adjust to, but once your feet adjust and your small muscles start engaging, you'll likely never go back to a plush runner again. The ability to feel the terrain beneath you and make micro-adjustments as you run seriously levels up the trail experience. If your runs take you through creeks, puddles, and rivers, know that the Bushido doesn't dry out as readily as flimsier built options. Trail enthusiasts seeking a burly, well-tractioned shoe that is suitable for nearly all trail occasions will love everything the highest-scoring Bushido offers.
We've tested the previous version of this shoe, the Bushido II, as well. It doesn't have nearly the impressive traction as this latest version does and isn't quite as comfortable. It's still a pretty solid shoe, though, and for a past-season sale price, it could be a solid choice for you.
Through creeks, snowfields, and across alpine peaks, the Bushido III is a rugged trail shoe that will get you where you want to be with comfort, sensitivity, and ultimate protection.
Weight (per shoe): 7.52 oz | Measured Heel-to-Toe Drop: 4 mm
REASONS TO BUY
Affordable
Incredibly comfortable
Great traction
Stable
Durable
Great for all distances
REASONS TO AVOID
A bit less sensitive
The Hoka Torrent 3 is a long-time favorite for its wear-all-day comfort and approachable price. In fact, this is the shoe we recommend to most trail runners because of its almost universal comfort. Loaded with a responsive and cushioned midsole, we ran 20+ mile distances (sometimes all at once) with ease. The traction is made of high-performing, sticky rubber and multidirectional lugs. The Torrent 3 transitions nicely from the trail to the road, and the lugs stay strong and beefy even when worn on abrasive surfaces. The Torrent is an excellent choice if you're looking for a versatile and affordable trail shoe that'll carry you through distances of all lengths.
Hoka is known for making comfortable shoes, but the toe box of the Torrent 3 is a bit narrow, and no wide sizes are available. However, with a bit of wear, these trail shoes pack out for an ultra-customized fit. If you want a shoe with a wide toe box from the jump, there are better options, but if you want a bit more impact absorption and comfort for miles on end, this budget-friendly model comes with our highest recommendations.
Weight (per shoe): 8.05 oz | Measured Heel-to-Toe Drop: 9 mm
REASONS TO BUY
Excellent protection and traction
Molds to your foot
Stable and sensitive
Durable
Fast-drying and breathable
REASONS TO AVOID
Collar is tight
Expensive
Lace pocket is ineffective
The Salomon S/Lab Ultra 3 is a shoe that stands out for ultra-distance fanatics. With just enough cushion, incredible sensitivity, and what ultimately feels like a customizable fit, the S/Lab is one of our most recommended technical shoes. The strong mesh upper is flexible enough to allow your toes to flex and engage as you run, while the standard trail shoe differential provides great stability. The snug fit of the midfoot and collar makes it feel like an extension of your body on the trails, a coveted feature as the distance adds up. The S/Lab dries quickly after being soaked and allows enough airflow to be a strong contender for hot desert runs.
The S/Lab Ultra 3 is on the expensive side, which is something you'll have to consider as you shop. It is a bit tougher to get on than a traditionally shaped running shoe since the sock liner collar is meant to fit snugly. The one-pull lace system is a polarizing feature that some runners love, and others hate. The mechanism can get gunked up if you run muddy or wet trails, and the lace pocket for the excess laces is virtually ineffective. But if you want a trail shoe that will feel like part of your body as you run over long challenging trails, this protective, sensitive, and flexible superstar is a fantastic option. It has been a GearLab award winner and favorite for many, many years.
This is a unisex shoe and has also been tested in our best men's trail running shoe review if you want to read a second perspective. Our reviews are comparative (i.e., scores are based on how each shoe compares to everything else in the lineup), so some models don't always score the same between our male and female reviewers. However, in the case of the Ultra 3, the good feelings and high scores are mutual.
The updated S/Lab is our go-to recommendation for trail runners who want to tackle technical, varied terrain.
Weight (per shoe): 7.95 oz | Measured Heel-to-Toe Drop: 5 mm
REASONS TO BUY
Excellent traction
Streamlined fit
Responsive
REASONS TO AVOID
Runs slightly narrow
Not a minimalistic ride
The Saucony Peregrine 14 rides like your forever favorite road running shoe, making it a top choice for runners seeking familiar comfort on the trails. This new version is loaded with updated cushion, a plush tongue, and redesigned lugs for abrasion resistance. With rugged trail prowess, a budget-friendly price tag, and well-rounded comfort, runners seeking a user-friendly trail shoe will love what the Peregrine provides. Weighing it at just under 8 ounces per women's US size 6.5, the Peregrine comes with a midsole full of PWRRUN foam, a flexible rock plate, and (we think) a perfect toe cap.
Saucony tends to make slightly narrow shoes but has chosen to release a wide Peregrine this time around. By providing more inclusive sizing, this fantastic trail shoe can suit a wider variety of runners. If you are looking for a minimalistic trail shoe, the new plushness of the Peregrine will feel overbuilt. But if you want comfortable cushion, great protection, and a familiar fit, the 5 mm drop Peregrine might be your perfect match.
We have tested numerous previous versions of this shoe and found them all to have excellent features that we've been recommending to trail runners who love this sort of fit. While improvements have been made to the Peregrine over the years, if you find the Peregrine 13 or even the version 12 in your size for a good price, we still recommend these excellent shoes.
The Saucony Peregrine 14 is a great choice for runners who are transitioning from roads to trails, as it fits like a road true but provides the protection and traction of a true trail shoe.
Weight (per shoe): 8.14 oz | Measured Heel-to-Toe Drop: 0 mm
REASONS TO BUY
Ultra comfortable
Fantastically stable
Reconfigured upper for added comfort
REASONS TO AVOID
Zero-drop isn't for everyone
On the heavier side
The Altra Lone Peak 8 continues to shine as a perfect choice among ultra-distance runners and hikers, and it's not hard to see why. Boasting 20 mm of stack and cushioning across the entire midsole and a 0.22-inch-thick tongue, along with an expansive toe box, this shoe facilitates a natural splay of the forefoot. This spacious toe box is particularly beneficial for enhancing foot and toe muscle development, potentially aiding in the resolution of foot and toe-related issues in some runners. With its confirmed measured heel-toe drop of 0 mm, this shoe is ideally suited for individuals who run forefoot first, as opposed to heel striking. We highly recommend the Lone Peak 8 for runners and hikers seeking a plush, comfortable, and long-lasting trail companion with a zero-drop design.
Adapting to the zero-drop design of the Lone Peak requires a bit of adjustment period since most traditional shoes are designed with a slight heel lift. Without additional cushioning in the heel to elevate it, your body's rear chain of muscles will need to exert more effort, potentially leading to strain on the Achilles tendon, calves, and soles of your feet. With consistent training and gradual acclimatization, this discomfort can diminish over time. If you're new to zero-drop footwear, it's advisable not to expect immediate long-distance running capabilities with this shoe. Nevertheless, for individuals in search of a cushioned, well-protected, and generously spacious trail running shoe that allows for toe splaying, the Lone Peak fits the bill perfectly.
We've been testing consecutive versions of the Lone Peak for years now, and it remains our favorite zero-drop option on the market. The Lone Peak 7 is nearly as good as this latest version, and if you can find it on sale, we solidly recommend it.
The comfort of the Lone Peak 8 makes it a great choice for trail runners who want to prioritize long-distance ease.
Weight (per shoe): 8.54 oz | Measured Heel-to-Toe Drop: 13 mm
REASONS TO BUY
Excellent traction on soft surfaces
Specific fit
Fantastic durability
Very protective
REASONS TO AVOID
Lugs wear on pavement
Heel stack makes it slightly less stable
Unique shape won't fit all feet
The Salomon Speedcross 6 stands out for its crampon-inspired grip that easily tackles muddy, messy trails. The 6 mm chevron-shaped lugs are well-spaced and shed mud effectively, keeping you going even when the rain pours. This shoe offers cushion and a sensitive forefoot so you can feel the trail while retaining just the right amount of needed protection. The heel is extra cushioned, which makes it a great match for heel strikers. We appreciate the specific fit and updated upper that hugs the foot so you won't likely experience toe bumps when charging on the downhills. The same fit profile helps stabilize you as you take on sloppy trails. The Speedcross is durable, so expect a long lifecycle with this contender.
There are only a few notable caveats regarding the Speedcross 6. It is not the ideal crossover shoe as the soft rubber that sticks well when scrambling over rocks will wear down quickly on a classic road run. Some of our testers also felt that the steeper sidewall and elevated heel made for a less stable ride on super tricky terrain. The heel height, which we measured at 33 mm, and the narrow architecture prevent this from being a shoe that all uniquely shaped runners will love. But if you seek something that'll do well on technical, steep, and sloppy terrain, this is the one to buy.
The Speedcross is one of the most ruggedly equipped shoes we have tested. It also strikes a great balance between comfortable cushioning and sensitivity.
Weight (per shoe): 7.04 oz | Measured Heel-to-Toe Drop: 2 mm
REASONS TO BUY
Propulsive
Beefy protection
Lightweight
REASONS TO AVOID
Negative differential isn't for everyone
Not the most sensitive
The Altra Mont Blanc Carbon is unlike any other trail shoes we've tested, carbon-plated options included. The Mont Blanc is as propulsive as it is protective, making it a standout shoe for technical race days. A women's size 6.5 weighs in at just over 7 ounces, which is profoundly light for how much protection and strength this shoe offers. With a 2mm drop, as measured by our laboratory testing team, this neutral-feeling shoe makes a great race-day companion for runners accustomed to zero-drop kicks or those looking to try out a speed-centered trail shoe.
The Mont Blanc Carbon runs a bit small and slightly narrow, so we recommend sizing up for maximal comfort. Zero drop — or 2 mm drop, in this case — shoes are not for all runners, which narrows the scope of applications when it comes to this trail runner. The extreme underfoot protection of the Mont Blanc inhibits its sensitivity, making it a less suitable choice for runners seeking a lot of trail information. Trail runners who want a carbon-plated race day shoe or want to move away from plush zero-drop shoes will love the propulsion, comfort, and protection provided by this one-of-a-kind trail running shoe.
If you are seeking a low-differential, comfortable, and propulsive trail shoe, the protective Mont Blanc Carbon is the race-ready shoe to keep you company.
Weight (per shoe): 6.61 oz | Measured Heel-to-Toe Drop: 8 mm
REASONS TO BUY
Incredibly light
Well-tractioned
Extremely sensitive
Comfortable and durable upper
Responsive
REASONS TO AVOID
Less protective
Expensive
The Nnormal Kjerag is unlike the rest of the shoes in our roundup. It is otherworldly in how little it weighs, yet it provides strong traction and more protection than your typical road shoe. The Kjerag is exceptionally sensitive due to its lack of insole, providing the most intimate trail experience we've felt thus far. Its bootie-style tongue ensures a precise fit, and its Kevlar-coated upper is ready to take a beating.
All of the fantastic features of the Kjerag make it an understandably pricey shoe. And even though it offers some protection, there are more rugged options out there that will serve you better on tough, rocky trails. Often, protection and weight go hand-in-hand, so determining your priorities and the type of trail running you want to tackle will help you decide if this ultralight shoe is right for you.
Like several others in our lineup, this is also a unisex shoe. If you want a second deep dive from our male reviewer, we've got it.
The upper of the Kjerag is unique among the many, many trail shoes we have tested. It is stable without structure, which is nothing short of impressive.
Credit: Abriah Wofford
Compare Products
Our test teams organize their lives around running. They are thrilled that their hard work can help you find the right shoes.
Credit: Ally Arcuri
How We Test Women's Trail Running Shoes
For over a decade, we have traveled all over testing women's trail running shoes, getting our hands on hundreds of unique pairs. We've hiked up towering passes in Peru, run over summits in the Rocky Mountains, jogged over dry singletrack in the desert, raced across the beaches of California, and explored the most remote parts of the Pacific Northwest. Our main testing locations in recent years are Montaña de Oro State Park, on the rugged coast of California, south of Big Sur, and the iconic Lake Tahoe, California. Both locations offer sweeping vistas, scenic peaks, hundreds of miles of trail, and enough slippery scree to test an army of running shoes. Each pair of shoes in our lineup has logged at least 60 miles — some with over 1,000 miles if they last that long. Our review compiles this data to give you recommendations for your best trail sidekick — or two.
The Scoop on Our Stack Height Measurements
Stack height is a tricky measurement because there is no industry standard that companies follow. Consequently, companies can choose to measure their shoes' heel and forefoot height wherever and however they want. They might measure only the inner cushion of the shoe or neglect to include the insole or tread. They might just designate a number without actually measuring — we really don't know.
For our part, we want to utilize a standard across the board from shoe to shoe to make accurate comparisons. Therefore, we have conducted our measurements based on the requirements set by World Athletics, the international organization and governing body for running competitions. Based on their outlined requirements, we first measured the shoe's internal length without being worn. The heel is defined as 12% of the internal length, while the forefoot is 75% of the internal length. We then measure the thickness of the entire sole, including everything that will go between your foot and the ground. This includes the insole, cushion system, and tread. We take these same measurements at the same location for each and every shoe we test.
Our field testing of trail running shoes is divided across six rating metrics:
Foot Protection (25% of overall score weighting)
Traction (20% weighting)
Sensitivity (15% weighting)
Stability (15% weighting)
Comfort and Fit (15% weighting)
Weight (10% weighting)
We love ripping up trails in the shoes we test, but we also take the time to assess their unique differences from a more scientific standpoint.
Credit: Abriah Wofford
Why Trust GearLab
Our main tester, Ally Arcuri, is an avid trail runner, an exercise specialist, and a cancer survivor. Ally has been deep in the world of running for nearly two decades and truly found her feet on the trails. She has taken on ultra marathons in the Rocky Mountains and is currently training for shorter, speedier trail races. Ally has a degree in kinesiology from Cal State Fullerton and utilizes her knowledge of biomechanics heavily while assessing each pair of shoes. She currently lives next door to Montaña de Oro State Park in San Luis Obispo County, California, though she attributes her love of trails to her upbringing in the wilderness of South Lake Tahoe.
We go to extreme lengths to determine which shoes have the potential to become your new favorite trail partner.
Credit: Natalie Kafader
Analysis and Test Results
Our trail running shoe lineup and testing covers a wide range of products to reflect the best options on the market for most types of trail runners. Each shoe is subjected to the same tests to determine even tiny differences in performance with objectivity. After rating each across our metrics, we assign a comparative score to determine which has the best performance. We offer an in-depth comparison to help you find exactly what you're looking for.
What's the Best Value?
The value of a running shoe is relative, based on how many miles you like to lay down and the shoe's durability, versatility, and cost. If you like to run a variety of trail types, a shoe that offers exceptional versatility will be a better value for you than a more niche shoe that is suitable for only one terrain type. For example, many manufacturers are now releasing race-specific shoes that tend to be a bit pricier and narrower in their scope of applications. When it comes to value, it is important to determine how many pairs of shoes you feel comfortable purchasing and why. If you are ready to level up your races, the value of purchasing a specifically skilled shoe might be worth it. If you are a strong runner who loves serious endeavors but feels unmotivated by pace, more universally styled options will likely provide a better bang for your buck.
For runners looking for an epic shoe value, the Torrent is a great pick.
Credit: Ally Arcuri
The Hoka Torrent 3 is one example of a great value because of how versatile it is and because of its lower-than-average price tag. The Torrent is durable, doesn't pack out prematurely, and makes a great crossover shoe from trails to roads and back again. Because it does so well across the board, purchasing the Torrent means you won't need to buy other pairs of shoes if you like to switch up your terrain type.
The Brooks Divide 4 is another trail shoe that offers solid value. The Divide is made explicitly for light trails but boasts strong durability and comfort, which increase its value. This is a fantastic shoe for new trail runners who don't want to invest in some of the techier shoes just yet but want a familiar-fitting shoe that will hold up to the demands of life on the trail.
Built to be affordable without a ton of extra bulk, the Divide 4 is a perfect entry-level trail shoe based on its affordability and fit.
Credit: Abriah Wofford
Foot Protection
When considering the foot protection of a shoe, we systematically look at different elements and how they work together to create cohesive protection while bombing down (or up) trails. In some cases, foot protection impedes sensitivity, another one of our scoring metrics. Some of the best trail shoes on the market strike the perfect balance between protection from unexpected trail hazards and sensitivity to feel what is beneath you.
Considering all the elements that go into foot protection, here's the bird's eye view of how each shoe stacks up.
One of the first things we look for when it comes to foot protection is a rock plate. Though more and more of the best trail shoes are being released without them, rock plates tend to boost a shoe's underfoot protection. A rock plate is a small panel within the shoe's sole that protects your feet from feeling the sharp points of rocks as you travel over them. Shoes that are released without rock plates often have a thicker underfoot cushion, or “stack,” to dampen the intensity of the trail.
The underfoot stack of a shoe provides protection for your soles. Sometimes a rock plate is embedded for additional protection, other times the shoes rely on cushioning to create this effect.
Credit: Abriah Wofford
Beefy underfoot stacks can be as protective as rock plates, so shoes are measured on how well they protect the soles of our feet, not simply on the presence or absence of a rock plate. As you might imagine, the best rock plates are the ones you can't feel, but they still protect your feet. And some of the most protective heel stacks are also some of the thickest — but not always.
Though this doesn't take into consideration which shoes have rock plates (or carbon propulsion plates!), added stack height does often equate to better underfoot protection.
The Altra Mont Blanc Carbon and Adidas Terrex Agravic Speed Ultra are two carbon-plated shoes that should not be overlooked when it comes to underfoot protection. Both provide serious underfoot chonk to protect your soles from sharp rocks. The Altra Mont Blanc also impressed us with its serious upper foot protection. We were able to dial in the heel collar to keep most debris out, the flexible toe cap is highly effective, and when we poured water on them it rolled right off the surface.
The Altra Mont Blanc has a carbon plate that adds a TON of protection to these shoes that actually have a below-average stack height. The features of their upper also help to make this a highly protective shoe.
Credit: Natalie Kafader
We also assess the toe cap of each shoe for overall protectiveness. Accidentally stubbing your toe on a rogue rock can quickly sabotage the rest of your run, which is why toe bumpers exist. Some toe caps are constructed of a thin, flexible rubber coating that provides little protection. Other shoes have straight-up bumpers at the front, which can offer more than enough protection from accidental toe stubs.
Toe bumpers and toe caps can also be an extra barrier to keeping water and mud out of your shoes on a sloppy run.
Credit: Ally Arcuri
If you want a trail running shoe that prioritizes underfoot cushion for protection, we enthusiastically recommend those made by Hoka. The Torrent 3, Challenger 7, and Speedgoat 6 are divergent in the types of runners and terrain they best serve, but they all have one thing in common — thick, highly protective underfoot stacks, none of which have rock plates.
The stack height of the Challenger allows for great underfoot protection, but in a soft, springy type of way.
Credit: Ally Arcuri
Many trail shoes are manufactured with a specific terrain type in mind. The style of toe cap is a great way to suss out what kind of environment a shoe is made for. Shoes with more rigid toe caps tend to be made for rockier, tougher terrain, while shoes with a lamination-style toe cap are more equipped for flowy, sandy trails. The Topo Ultraventure 3, for example, is made for moderate trails and has a more flexible toe cap. It has a 30 mm stack in the forefoot and a 34 mm stack at the heel, which provides ample underfoot protection.
The Topo Ultraventure are solidly protective, with an above-average heel stack height and a flexible, effective toe cap.
Credit: Ally Arcuri
When measuring foot protection, we take a 360-degree look at each shoe, from its outsole to its toe box to its upper. While none of the shoes we've tested are waterproof, some are more water-resistant than others. Many of the shoes we tested also have a “GTX” version, where Gore-Tex is used to add water protection. If you know you'll be tackling a lot of water, look for this option — just know it's likely to be less breathable and more expensive. We tested the conventional versions of each shoe by splashing through standing water and mud and taking the occasional trip to the beach to let the ocean saturate our shoes.
Breathability is frequently associated with protection against water and debris, a metric you can visibly see via our smoke test. Higher breathability means smoke can escape more easily, but it also implies that organic matter like water and debris may find it easier to infiltrate the shoe.
Credit: Natalie Kafader
After getting each shoe wet to see how much water seeped through, we then timed how long it took them to dry. The Salomon S/Lab Ultra 3 doesn't offer much water resistance, but dries out very quickly in the sun. The single-pull lace system can get gunked up if you splash through a lot of mud, though. For solid summer-centric foot protection, we recommend the Nnormal Tomir 2.0. This shoe is highly breathable but still manages to provide great protection from water splashes and sand. The Saucony Peregrine 14 also has a mesh upper that does a solid job keeping particulates out on sandy runs — and there's a GTX version of the Peregrine for folks who really need extra water repellency.
The super-light upper of the S/Lab dries better than most of the shoes in our lineup.
Credit: Ally Arcuri
Another element we look at when it comes to foot protection is how well the heel collar protects and prevents sand from coming in. While none of the shoes we tested are completely impervious to sand being flung in through the heel collar, shoes with thicker cushions and more-contoured construction scored higher.
If you are a trail runner who hates getting sand or small pebbles in your shoes, we recommend investing in a pair of ankle gaiters (see our review of our favorite gaiters we've tested). Typically rather affordable, gaiters adhere to the back side of your shoe via a double-stick tape that is included with them, though many trail shoes come with a ready-to-use piece of velcro on the heel cup. Gaiters typically have hooks or bungees on the front that can anchor to the D-loops often found on trail shoes.
The Merrell Antora 3 has a thicker collar that rides close to the skin. The Salomon Pulsar Trail Pro 2 takes a different approach in that it creates a near-suction-like seal against your ankles. This makes the Pulsar Trail a bit more difficult to get on, but once it is on, sand and pebbles won't be a problem.
The thick heel collar of the Antora helps prevent sand from infiltrating.
The heel collar of the Pulsar Trail 2 seals your ankles in to prevent sand from sneaking in.
A tighter collar, like those found on the Merrell Antora 3 (left) and Salomon Pulsar Trail Pro 2 (right), helps keep out debris.
All factors combined, the Salomon Speedcross 6 is our go-to recommendation for sloppy, obstacle-riddled terrain, partly because of its awesome protection. It has a burly toe bumper and a super finely woven mesh upper. When testing each shoe's ability to prevent sand and other trail debris from infiltrating, the upper mesh is hugely important. The Speedcross does a great job deflecting water as you splash through puddles, though it takes longer to dry because it lacks lightness and breathability.
The Speedcross 6 is built to keep out everything you run through and keep your feet floating easily over uneven terrain.
Credit: Ally Arcuri
Traction
The outsole design of a trail shoe can make or break your experience. When it comes to traction, it is valuable to decide what kind of trail you'll be running the most and then decide on some contenders from there.
Most trail runners spend most of their time running on hardpacked trails. These traction metric scores include input from all the surfaces we tested shoes on, with weighted consideration given to the surfaces most people spend the most time on.
We tested each pair of shoes on slick, muddy trails, loose, scree-covered mountains, beaches, bike paths, and many terrain types in between. No trail shoe is completely slip-resistant, but they all provide significantly more grip than running shoes built only for pounding pavement.
Traction Ratings on Difficult Surfaces
Product
Loose Trail
Mud
Slick Rock
La Sportiva Bushido III
5
5
5
Nnormal Tomir 2.0
5
5
5
Altra Timp 5
5
5
4
Altra Mont Blanc Carbon
5
5
4
Saucony Peregrine 14
4
4
5
Hoka Speedgoat 6
4
4
5
Adidas Terrex Agravic Speed Ultra
5
4
4
Salomon S/Lab Ultra 3
4
4
4
Hoka Stinson 7
4
3
5
New Balance Fresh Foam X Hierro v8
5
3
4
La Sportiva Jackal II
4
4
4
Salomon Speedcross 6
3
5
3
Hoka Torrent 3
4
3
4
Nnormal Kjerag
4
3
3
Altra Lone Peak 8
3
4
3
Nike Zegama 2
3
3
4
Salomon Pulsar Trail Pro 2
3
3
3
Hoka Tecton X 2
4
2
3
Salomon Sense Ride 5
3
3
3
Topo Ultraventure 3
3
3
3
Brooks Catamount 3
4
2
2
Merrell Antora 3
3
2
3
Hoka Challenger 7
3
2
3
Nike Ultrafly
4
2
2
Brooks Divide 4
3
2
2
If you often find yourself running on suboptimal trails, we're right there with you. Here's how each shoe performed on difficult terrain and in sloppy situations.
While many different traction types exist, a few patterns stand out. In general, shoes with multidirectional lugs of differing shapes provide the best traction. The lugs on trail shoes tend to be around 4 mm, though there is no one-size-fits-all lug depth for manufacturers. On some of our highest-scoring shoes, the lugs are adorned with additional texturing, which can add even more grip. For ultimate grip, the outsole needs to be a bit sticky with lugs that are sharp and strong enough to slightly penetrate the earth.
While lug depth doesn't automatically mean shoes have more traction — shape, directionality, and texture also play large parts — it does help to understand what each shoe is working with.
One of the features that catapulted the La Sportiva Bushido III to being our favorite overall trail running shoe is its traction. The 3.8 mm lugs make the Bushido suitable for mellower terrain but truly shine on technical, loose terrain where you need to be in total control. The traction pattern of the heel is designed to act as a brake when you stomp it down into the trail. On mushy snow, through muddy creek beds, and loose rock, the traction of the Bushido held up and allowed us to explore our speed confidently.
The traction is the Bushido is some of the best we've had the pleasure of testing.
Credit: Ally Arcuri
The Speedcross 6 also stands out in this metric because of its deep and sharp 6 mm lugs. While the outsole is sticky, this shoe relies on the sharp points of its numerous tri-tipped lugs to keep you upright on loose and muddy terrain.
Thick, sharp lugs - like these on the Speedcross 6 - are built to keep you steady on loose, sloppy trails.
Credit: Ally Arcuri
The Nnormal Tomir 2.0 is very similar in functionality to the Speedcross. Its 4 mm lugs are impressively toothy, adding extra grip to the sticky outsoles on even the sloppiest trails. Even on melting high alpine snow fields, the Tomir didn't let us down.
The Nnormal Tomir 2.0 is another shoe that offers exceptional grip because of its strong lug pattern and Vibram outsole.
Credit: Ally Arcuri
The La Sportiva Jackal II is a solidly mountain-ready shoe. It has sharp-edged thick soles that easily grip rocks with their multidirectional, 5.6 mm lugs. The Altra Timp 5 and Altra Mont Blanc Carbon also have multidirectional lugs (the Timp are 4.8 mm deep and the Mont Blanc 3.0 mm deep) on very grippy Vibram outsoles. Both these pairs kept us going even on more challenging surfaces such as loose trails and in slippery mud. The Saucony Peregrine 14 has biting lugs but is particularly notable for having a sticky outsole that performs very well on slick rocks.
The multi-directional and sharp-edged chevron-shaped lugs of the Saucony Peregrine 14 make this comfortable trail shoe a true contender for epic terrain.
Credit: Ally Arcuri
The Torrent 3 and Ultraventure 3 are both distance-focused trail shoes that perform exceptionally well on moderate hardpacked trails. Both outsoles have strong, durable lugs that hold their grip on varied terrain types. In both cases, ample cushioning makes these shoes suitable for crossing over into road-running territory, which is helpful if you cruise through your neighborhood to get to your local trail system.
Though designed slightly differently, the Ultraventure's traction still provides that iconic Vibram grip and sharp-edged lugs for control. This shoe combines control and grip with comfort, making it ideal for long-distance efforts.
Credit: Ally Arcuri
Sensitivity
We rank each shoe's sensitivity, or the ability to feel the specifics of the trail beneath you, but where each runner's personal preference lies is a delightfully colorful spectrum. Many trail runners value sensitivity because feeling the undulations and unique trail features beneath you can encourage your body to make micro-adjustments as you run. The stabilizing muscles in your feet and lower legs can work harmoniously when they receive information about where and when to engage or relax. Other trail runners prefer shoes that provide dampened sensitivity, meaning they can feel that something is beneath their feet, but they can't feel exactly how pointy the rock or stick is. If you are a runner who wants a thick underfoot stack for joint cushioning and ultra-distance efforts, the “worst” in this metric might be the best fit for you.
This chart shows the relative sensitivity of each shoe in our lineup. Depending on how and where you like to run, one of the LEAST sensitive pairs might actually be what you're looking for.
The La Sportiva Bushido III offers supreme sensitivity with a 28 mm stack in the rearfoot and a 21 mm stack in the forefoot. This is slightly thicker than the previous version of the Bushido but still maintains an impressive level of sensitivity. This shoe is the shoe we wholeheartedly recommend if you want an intimate trail experience.
Highly sensitive shoes like the La Sportiva Bushido III take a bit of time to adjust to. Once your feet are primed and ready, these shoes can go the distance with you.
Credit: Ally Arcuri
The Nnormal Kjerag also tops our charts when it comes to sensitivity due to its lack of insole, and outsole flexibility. The Altra Lone Peak 8 maintains impressive sensitivity on trails, despite the inclusion of a rock plate in its sole. With one of the thinnest soles in our lineup and a wide toe box that lets your toes spread and feel things more keenly, the Lone Peak provides quite a bit of trail information.
The flexible outsole and lack of insole make the Kjerag one of the most sensitive trail shoes on the market today.
Credit: Ally Arcuri
The S/Lab Ultra 3 is another high scorer in this metric. Sitting 27 mm above the earth at the heel and 18 mm at the toe, its flexible outsole bends and curves around rocks and ruts in the trail. The S/Lab offers just enough cushion to remain a highly sensitive shoe that is appropriate for long distances over technical trails.
The S/Lab offers a prime balance between flexibility, sensitivity, support, and stability.
Credit: Ally Arcuri
Stability
The stability of a shoe is hugely important when it comes to keeping your body safe and healthy on the trails. Stability can best be described as how secure and surefooted you feel on trails, especially when you misstep and land on an unexpected hazard. Does the shoe move with your foot as your body adjusts to regain balance, or does it go one way while your foot goes another? The latter option can result in rolled ankles and more serious injuries, which is part of why stability is so important.
We considered each shoe's security on our feet, performance over uneven surfaces, vertical height, and overall feeling when running varied terrains to assess their stability.
Typical road running shoes have an 8-12 mm heel-to-toe drop (the difference between the heel and forefoot stack heights). For the most part, trail shoes have a less significant drop because the lower your heel is to the ground, the more stable you become. The strength of the upper textiles and the inclusion of lateral structures can also aid in creating a super stable trail shoe.
Often, a smaller heel-to-toe differential helps to create more stability over uneven surfaces.
Altra is known for making epic zero-drop shoes, such as the Lone Peak and Timp, which means that the heel and toe sit at the same distance above the ground. This style of shoe encourages your rear chain muscles to engage more readily, creating more stability. The caveat here is that zero-drop shoes are not comfortable for all bodies, especially if you're unaccustomed to the fit. If you like zero-drop or low-drop shoes, the latest version of the Lone Peak is one of the most stable trail running shoes we've tested, with a secure fit that helps these shoes feel like an extension of your feet. The Mont Blanc is Altra's entry into the carbon-plated world of racing shoes. Though our in-house testing team measured a 2 mm drop on this stable shoe, that differential is because of the geometry of the rocker — when standing still, these shoes maintain a drop that's even closer to level, as Altra claims.
Multiple elements have to come together to create prime stability. We dig into every detail to determine the depth of each shoe's metric scoring.
Credit: Natalie Kafader
Salomon recently released a redesigned version of their comfortable standby, the Salomon Pulsar Trail Pro 2. This shoe boasts a 3 mm drop but is structured in a way that makes it feel less obvious than the Altra shoes we have tested. With hearty traction, a strong midfoot lock, and a spacious-but-not-clown-like toe box, this is a shoe built for stability and agility.
The Pulsar Trail Pro 2 became one of our testers' fast-favorites because of its security, agility, and comfortable approach to low-drop trail running.
Credit: Ally Arcuri
The Hoka Torrent 3 is, according to our standardized measurements, a 4 mm drop shoe and has a more svelte profile. It has a bit more responsive bounce than your typical stability-forward shoe, making it an excellent choice for runners who want stability and speed. The Torrent has a way of absorbing the impact of rogue rocks and missteps that feels supremely stable.
A super stable shoe like the Torrent 3 can help absorb the impact of rogue rocks that may otherwise be considered ankle twisters.
Credit: Ally Arcuri
Another element that plays into stability is the width of your shoe. We don't suggest you hurtle down trails in something with a lot of lateral wiggle room, but you should have enough in-shoe real estate for your toes to splay and muscles to engage. Giving your feet this bit of space allows your muscles to work properly, which is your body's way of finding stability as you run. The Lone Peak and Pulsar Trail 2 are super stable shoes because they hit all these key elements that lead to stability. With a plush zero-drop differential (the Lone Peak is significantly more padded than the Pulsar Trail) and an emphasis on toe box space, these are our go-to recommendations for runners who want a very stable shoe.
The Lone Peak 8's width and plush construction make it particularly suitable for runners who prioritize stability and comfort.
Credit: Ally Arcuri
The La Sportiva Bushido III and Hoka Stinson 7 both have fairly average heel-to-toe drops of 7 mm and 8 mm, respectively. Both these shoes have a very secure fit through their heels, though, helping them to feel quite stable and secure on our runs, despite not having an overly low profile.
Despite the relative chunkiness of the Hoka Stinson 7 soles, their impressively secure fit helped them to rise to the top in our stability tests.
Credit: Natalie Kafader
The Topo Ultraventure 3, Salomon S/Lab Ultra 3, Hoka Speedgoat 6, and Merrell Antora 3 all have closer to standard heel-to-toe drop differentials, but all four also have very secure heel cups overall fits on our whole testing team. This level of security made all four of these shoes feel impressively stable, even barreling down steep tracks.
The Merrell Antora have a heel-toe drop of 8 mm, which is a tad high compared to most trail shoes. However, they securely grip our heels, giving them above-average stability.
Credit: Ally Arcuri
The Tecton X 2 is another shoe that offers great stability and a 6 mm drop but can encourage your legs to turn over faster, thanks to its carbon fiber plate. While no shoe is completely fool-proof, we absolutely trust the Torrent to keep us stable and upright even on extremely fatigued legs.
Lightweight and peppy all around, the cushioning of the Tecton makes it comfortable, while its carbon plate makes it extra responsive. This is our top recommendation for runners who need stability but crave speed.
Credit: Ally Arcuri
The updated Brooks Catamount 3 is another trail running shoe with solid stability due to its strong structure. With solid traction and protection, it rides strong and sturdy, with its slightly narrow midfoot presenting our only concern. The 8 mm drop feels extra stable because of how strong the heel cup holds the foot in place.
The slightly rigid sidewalls of the new Catamount help create some stability. Runners who want to avoid zero-drop shoes but prioritize stability should check out the Catamount 3 by Brooks.
Credit: Ally Arcuri
Comfort and Fit
This is a tricky metric to assess because of how different every runner's needs and preferences are. We took a holistic approach to evaluating comfort and fit, assessing all of the details of the shoe and aligning that with what kind of runner might prefer each feature set. We describe some shoes as “universally comfortable,” meaning their comfort will appeal to the masses. Other shoes with more niche features will be less universally beloved because their fits tend to be a bit more specific. As we tested, we considered the spaciousness of the toe boxes, the width of the midfoot, and whether or not the heel collar rubs the ankle. We noted how long each shoe took to feel like our own and endeavored to be as unbiased as possible as we focused on how each pair felt on our feet.
We enlisted a team of runners to try out every shoe in our lineup and give feedback about their overall fit and level of comfort during runs.
In general, shoes with a bit more cushion and toe box space scored higher in this metric. A shoe that stands out to us as one that we think will be highly comfortable for many people is the Hoka Torrent 3. With its supportive but padded body extending through the heel collar, this shoe strikes the perfect balance between forgiving and stiff. Its plush, padded tongue prevents the laces from digging in as your feet naturally swell. The toe box isn't as wide as other shoes we've tested, but the mesh upper has a way of molding to accommodate each unique foot shape. The Torrent 3 requires a few break-in miles, but once the upper starts to soften, it becomes a trail companion you'll never know how you lived without.
The breathable yet protective mesh upper of the Torrent expands to accommodate your unique foot shape, making it one of the most personally comfortable shoes on the market.
Credit: Ally Arcuri
The Lone Peak 8 may not be as universally coveted because of its zero-drop profile, but if that's alright with you, this is one of the most comfortable and well-fitting trail shoes we've tested. Its extra-wide toe box is incredibly comfortable, while the midfoot taper holds your foot in place. The general plushness aligns with a bit of arch support for a shoe that cradles your footbed. While this pillowy, zero-drop shoe won't be for everyone, those who love it will delight in its rugged softness.
While zero-drop shoes aren't for everyone, the body of the Lone Peak 8 is one of the most comfortable we have tested to date.
Credit: Ally Arcuri
The Topo Ultraventure 3 is a comfortable option with a wide toe box. It's not as plush as the Lone Peak, but it also isn't a zero-drop shoe, so it may appeal to a wider variety of trail runners. With a crowd-pleasing 4 mm drop and a versatile fit, the Ultraventure is another high-ranking, comfortable shoe that should be on your radar if comfort is key. The Hoka Speedgoat 6 also stands out in this metric with some new updates that make it cushy, flexible, and breathable.
The Ultraventure has a toe box that is similar to that of the Lone Peak, but since it isn't zero-drop runner, it might appeal to a wider variety of runners.
Credit: Ally Arcuri
Similar to the Torrent 3, the Salomon S/Lab Ultra has the capability to conform to the individual contours of your foot, providing a comfortable cradle. With just a few runs, you'll notice signs of this contouring, particularly in the forefoot area, enhancing the overall comfort and personalized feel of the ride. The Pulsar Trail Pro 2 is another shoe that, after several runs, adapts to your foot's unique shape, resulting in heightened comfort and agility.
The Pulsar Trail Pro 2 offers a seamless blend of comfort and agility, ensuring a pretty optimal running experience.
Credit: Ally Arcuri
The updated Saucony Peregrine 14 is a standout trail shoe in the comfort and fit metric. The new iteration of this shoe feels stuffed with comfort from its tongue to its sole. We tout this shoe's overall awesomeness because it rides like a typical road shoe, negating the need to have a “break in” period to adapt to the ride a shoe offers. The Peregrine runs ever so slightly on the narrow side, but Saucony offers a wide version, allowing more runners to find a comfortable fit.
The new Peregrine is full of comfort. With a wide version on the table, this shoe is a seriously powerful comfort contender that is ready to be roughed up.
Credit: Ally Arcuri
Weight
Weighing trail running shoes is one thing, but weighing them and then assessing how that weight feels as you run is a whole different party. First, we weigh each shoe — in women's US size 6.5 — right out of the box, and then we assess that weight as it compares to the average weight of our current lineup. It's worth noting that textiles, rubbers, and foams are becoming lighter and lighter, and the entire current lineup of shoes we tested is within less than three ounces of each other (per shoe).
While not everyone wants a light pair of shoes, sometimes cutting ounces can be the right call.
We also consider what features and attributes each pair of shoes brings to the table. Some runners are looking for super lightweight and responsive kicks so they can throttle up and down mountainsides, while others aren't concerned with their shoe's weight. It's important to note that unless ultralight running is your game, the lightest weight does not always make the best trail running shoe.
Some shoes are lightweight and have a fit and balance that help them feel that way on the trail.
Credit: Ally Arcuri
The most notable ultralight shoe in our lineup is the Nnormal Kjerag, an impossibly light shoe that provides protection and just enough cushion. Weighing in at just 6.61 ounces, this is the lightest shoe we have had the pleasure of testing. The weave of its upper allows it to ride snug to your feet, and with just enough responsive bounce, the Kjerag feels weightless and peppy during runs. That said, it unsurprisingly lacks some of the cushioning that super long-distance lovers might want or need.
The Kjerag may lack the cushion of a shoe for ultra running, but its weightless feel, responsive pep, and sock-like comfort make it a shoe that our testers are excited to run in.
Credit: Ally Arcuri
The Altra Mont Blanc weighs a remarkable 7.04 ounces per shoe. This is impressive because of how protective and propulsive it is. This is the second lightest shoe we tested this time around, making it an ideal race-day contender for runners looking for a heavy-hitting shoe. On the opposite end of the “intended use spectrum,” the Brooks Catamount 3 is one of the lighter shoes in our lineup and offers solid performance for its impressively low weight.
The Catamount 3 are some of the lightest shoes in our lineup, helping them to feel balanced and blend seamlessly to our feet as we run.
Credit: Ally Arcuri
The Hoka Challenger is notably lightweight, especially considering its cushion, weighing only 7.28 ounces per shoe. On par with it are the Hoka Torrent 3 and Hoka Tecton X 2, which weigh 7.52 ounces and 7.27 ounces, respectively. Because of their thick soles, all three of these shoes appear heavier than they actually are, which is a welcome surprise.
The Challenger has a thick outsole, but its lightweight makes it great for runners who want to throttle down trails.
Credit: Ally Arcuri
A handful of the most well-featured shoes regarding protection score the lowest in the weight metric. The Salomon Speedcross 6 is a rather niche shoe that scored low in this metric. However, the relatively higher weight of the Speedcross is well worth it if you consistently run on muddy, mucky trails. The weight rides low, which is a unique feeling if you are accustomed to a more traditional fit. But the beef and weight distribution of the Speedcross allows it to do what it needs to, which is to keep you upright on slippery, hilly terrain.
No matter where your trail runs may take you, we hope it's a blast.
Credit: Ally Arcuri
Conclusion
Your running needs will dictate what kind of trail running shoe will be right for you. We have tested options that prevail on steep mountainsides and others that thrive on sandy singletrack. While no shoe is going to be right for every runner, we hope that by digging into the nuances of some of the best trail running shoes on the market, we can help guide you toward a shoe that will excite you to hit the trails.
